| Total
External Storage Shipped in India 2004-05 (By GB) |
| |
Q1 |
%
Share |
Q2 |
%
Share |
Q3 |
%
Share |
Q4 |
%
Share |
Total |
| EMC |
405,977 |
36 |
305,864 |
19 |
350,840 |
17 |
428,192 |
20 |
1,490,873 |
| HP |
260,317 |
23 |
618,835 |
38 |
593,845 |
29 |
503 ,035 |
23 |
1,976,032 |
| NetApp |
235,658 |
21 |
288,003 |
18 |
390,161 |
19 |
439,216 |
20 |
1,353,038 |
| Sun |
46,361 |
4 |
99,803 |
6 |
169,375 |
8 |
297,000 |
14 |
612,539 |
| IBM |
72,477 |
6 |
135,941 |
8 |
215,065 |
11 |
182,412 |
8 |
605,895 |
| Hitachi
Data Systems |
14,277 |
1 |
43,896 |
3 |
146,680 |
6 |
125,300 |
6 |
330,153 |
| Others |
104,387 |
9 |
136,984 |
8 |
141,939 |
10 |
214,637 |
9 |
597,947 |
| Total |
1,139,453 |
|
1,629,326 |
|
2,007,905 |
|
2,189,793 |
|
6,966,477 |
| Source:
IDC India |
|
| Total
External Storage Average |
| $/GB
Pricing in 2004 |
| |
Q1 |
Q2 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
2004
YTD |
| EMC |
22 |
23 |
22 |
20 |
22 |
| HP |
20 |
20 |
13 |
13 |
15 |
| NetApp |
24 |
20 |
19 |
16 |
19 |
| Sun |
32 |
41 |
38 |
38 |
38 |
| IBM |
33 |
30 |
26 |
26 |
28 |
| HDS |
37 |
38 |
26 |
24 |
26 |
| Others |
20 |
18 |
12 |
12 |
15 |
| Total |
23 |
23 |
19 |
19 |
20 |
| Source:
DQ estimates |
CyberMedia
Research
|
|
|
 |
 |
| Source:
DQ estimates |
CyberMedia
Research
|
|
|
|
| Source:
DQ estimates |
CyberMedia
Research
|
|
| •
Pureplay storage vendors like EMC, NetApp or Hitachi gained ground; giants like HP, IBM or Sun who were pushing storage along with servers found the going tougher |
| •
In the secondary storage tape backup market, India ranked second only behind Australia in the Asia-Pacific market, with 19% of the overall market share |
|
Page(s) 1
|
Print
Comment
Email
Digg
Del.icio.us
Reddit
Twitter
