SAP consolidated its position, with close to 500 new customers,
including 260 enterprises across verticals, the rest being SMBs. Traditional
weakness in telecom started getting addressed as it bagged new accounts like
Reliance Communications and Aktel in Bangladesh. Retail (Provogue, Khazana, and
Reliance Retail), construction (Oberoi Constructions, K Raheja, and Hiranandani),
and airlines (Kingfisher Airlines and IndiGo) were the sunshine sectors where it
made inroads.
|
Total
Business Applications Market |
|
Company |
Revenue
(Rs crore) |
|
ERP |
1,056 |
|
SCM |
469 |
|
CRM |
689 |
|
Middleware |
260 |
|
RDBMS |
1,078 |
|
BI |
531 |
|
Productivity Suites |
550 |
|
Graphic Tools |
560 |
|
Engineering Tools |
450 |
|
Vertical Applications |
1,250 |
|
Others |
200 |
|
Total Market |
7,093 |
|
|
 |
| Source: DQ estimate
CyberMedia Research |
|
Core banking constitutes a major part
of vertical apps. Indian companies are strong players here |
SAPs two tier structure of distribution and implementation
partners paid offwhile IBM (new signing), HP, eSys, and Wipro Infotech helped
address the enterprises, the likes of OBTGlobal, Spectrasoft, and Seal Infotech
took care of the mid-market organizations. The New ERP 2500 rebuilt on the
Netweaver platform was launched during the year; it heralded the beginning of
the shift from ERP to SOA. Clearly, SAP was trying to build a passage to shift
its customers to ESOA, not just as a new technology but as a different business
process platform.
Oracles #2 position was sealed, courtesy its license renewal
with few marquee customers and new wins like LG, Maruti Udyog, and Cummins India
among others. Like SAP, Oracle too looked at making ERP available on its open
standards based SOA; Godfrey Phillips India, Indias second largest tobacco
company decided to automate and integrate its internal business processes by
this technology.
That Oracle not only countered the SAP domination, but carved
out and expanded its own turf was a testimony to its success in not just
acquiring other vendors, but in managing multiple brands in a maturing market.
While both the PeopleSoft and Siebel brands were maintained, Oracle took over
the provision of customer support for and development of India-specific features
in its JD Edwards EnterpriseOne applications. This move reflected Oracles
increased focused on the JD Edwards customer base in India, especially in light
of SAPs move to woo JDE and PeopleSoft customers.
In fact, customer win backs was a common phenomenon during
2006-07; it was a scenario of mutual quid pro quid between the two protagonists
in the ERP drama. While MRF Tyres, JK Tyres, and Godrej Industries were SAPs
competitive winbacks from Oracle (it won back Havells from Infor), the latter
returned the compliments by winning Tata Motors and ITC back from SAP.
|
Indian
SCM Market |
|
Company |
Revenue
(Rs crore) |
|
SAP |
184 |
|
Oracle |
94 |
|
SSA Global (Infor) |
48 |
|
Take Solutions |
20 |
|
Microsoft |
18 |
|
3i Infotech |
16 |
|
Ramco |
14 |
|
Intentia |
11 |
|
QAD |
9 |
|
i2 |
5 |
|
Others |
50 |
|
Total |
469 |
|
|
 |
| Source: DQ
estimate CyberMedia Research |
| The complex
product life-cycle of an automobile with thousands of suppliers and
sub-contractors necessitated SCM deployment. |
The SMBs turned out to be the ultimate objects of desire; they
were courted aggressively by all ERP vendors, biggies, and others alike, though
each tasted varying success. The likes of SAP and Oracle seemed to have bagged
the maximum attention: SAP acquired more than 200 mid-market customers that
included the likes of Kajaria Tiles, Greenply, Century Ply, Rupa, Sa Re Ga Ma,
and Tata Sky; Oracle bagged the likes of Sonic Biochem (Indore), Auto Clutches (Goa),
Noble Grains (Jaipur), Indian Copper Complex, Apex Auto (Bhubaneswar), CMA CGM
Logistics Park (Lucknow), and Bihar Education Project in Muzaffarpur. This also
showed their expansion into B&C class cities.
Even Microsoft with its Dynamics range of ERP solutions made
strong forays into the SMB space. Thanks to the 500 customers it bagged
(included the likes of Vishal Megamart) during 2006-07, Microsoft could climb to
fourth in the ERP pecking order. Not just in business terms, recognition also
came in the form of Microsoft being awarded the Frost & Sullivan Growth
Strategy Leadership Award for Mid Market ERP in 2006.
SCM: Another Duopoly Regime
Like ERP, this was another market marked by the duopoly of SAP and Oracle;
together, they garnered 60% of the market, leaving other vendors to fight out
for their niche individual turfs. One reason for this domination could have been
the large sizes of deals inked by the likes of Maruti Udyog and Tata Motors; it
was not possible for the smaller players to handle deals of such magnitude. Baans
traditional presence in manufacturing helped its new avatar Infor to at least
secure the third position, though it too lost on not only new accounts, but
existing clients like Havells switched allegiance to SAP.
As market technology shifted and SCM product offerings matured
at the same time, the user enterprises during 2006-07 sought a better
price/performance ratio. A key requirement in achieving a higher ratio was
vertical-specific software patterns. Again the biggies like SAP and Oracle
scored on this front, as the likes of Take Solutions, Intentia or QAD lacked the
wherewithal to achieve multi-vertical expertise. Page(s) 1 2 3 4
|