|
Captiveslike GE, BA, SwissAir, and American Expresswere
the harbingers of what is today called offshore BPO in India. At one time, they
accounted for the lions share of business services exports from India.
They no longer do. That is an extremely simple statement many
would not be able to digest. If we give some numbers heresay their revenue
share in the overall exports has gone down to 45% or 42%that will probably be
headline stuff.
Unfortunately, we are not confident enough to give that big
number. The reason is not difficult to imagine for anyone who knows this
segment. Unlike the third partiessome of who shout from the rooftops on their
growthcaptives are secretive about sharing any number, primarily because of
fear of backlash, as most of them are consumer-facing companies. Some of them go
out of their way to ensure that the numbers are not leaked by employees,
partners, or suppliers. In the absence of any such data, we had to manage with
the best we could do.
And, that does not give us a big number to share with you. But,
what we can tell you with a lot of confidence is that they no longer export more
than the third parties.
The reason why big numbers are quoted is because at one time,
they did dominate the business services export. And, despite the fact that many
of them have ceased to growsome have in fact gone down on their headcountthe
myth lives on: that captives are big. The absence of data only intensifies the
myth.
|
The Captive
Top 20 (Based on Manpower) |
|
Rank |
Company |
|
1 |
Dell International Services |
|
2 |
HSBC Electronic Data
Processing |
|
3 |
JP Morgan Chase (JPMC) BPO |
|
4 |
Citigroup Global Services (CGS)
(formerly eServe) |
|
5 |
RR Donnelley Global BPO
(formerly OfficeTiger) |
|
6 |
Aviva Global Services (AGS) |
|
7 |
Scope International Services
(Standard Chartered) |
|
8 |
ABN AMRO Central Enterprise
Services (ACES) |
|
9 |
3 Global India |
|
10 |
HP* |
|
11 |
AXA Business Services (ABS) |
|
12 |
BA Continuum Solutions (Bank
of America) |
|
13 |
Deutsche Network Services (dNets) |
|
14 |
Allianz Cornhill Insurance
Services (ACIS) |
|
15 |
Tesco Hindustan Service
Center (HSC) |
|
16 |
Reuters India |
|
17 |
Prudential Process
Management Services (PPMS) |
|
18 |
AOL Online Member Services
India |
|
19 |
American Express |
|
20 |
Morgan Stanley Advantage
Services |
|
20 |
Goldman Sachs |
|
*HP figures taken for
ranking does not include its third party BPO manpower |
The Changing Equation
The captives versus the third party BPO debate continues to simmer globallywith
the epicenter of that debate in India. While the news of offshore captive
centers opening are still common, a slightly discerning look would reveal that
many of the new captives are small IT design/development centers, and not large
scale processing centers like those of HSBC or Standard Chartered.
If anything, some of these are turning third party. Till three
years back, Genpact was a captive. Its changing from a captive to third party
model sent two messages: it is not possible to continue as captives and still
keep growing; and that large, trend-setting companies like GE are now quite
confident about outsourcing. For the analysts, however, that means the
captive-third party balance changed drastically, with a big chunk now being
classified under third party. WNS, which had taken that route earlier, may have
been a pioneer, but its numbers did not have that kind of impact on the balance.
Since then, Unilever has sold stake in its third party to
Capgemini. Now, with the 8,000 people Citigroup Global Services up for sale,
that equation may change even more in favor of third parties. There is also the
likelihood of Scope (captive arm of Stanchart) and JP Morgan, two other major
players, transforming themselves into third parties. There are rumors in the
market that the Prudential captive (PPMS) operations was being eyed by a few
companies including UKs Capita Group. Page(s) 1 2 3
|