Home  |  Newsletter | Feedback | Advertise - Online  | Help

Google
Web dqindia.com
Search by issue  | Sitemap

• Visit pcquest.com to know all about the business benefits of IT infrastructure outsourcing • Ad : Play and Plug ERP by IBM

 
Home > Trends

An Unholy Alliance?
It may not be a boon for the consumer, as cellular operators are not ready to give him the choice of NLD operator—a promise that the National Telecom Policy of 1999 clearly made
Pravin Prashant
Thursday, January 10, 2002

Advertisement

The December 18 announcement by cellular mobile service providers (CMSP), except MTNL, Aircell, Hexacom, Reliance, and RPG, of reducing mobile-to-mobile STD call charges by 50% from January 26 has triggered a new debate. It remains to be seen whether the new tariff will be approved by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI), even as consumers have been given no say in the choice of NLD operator.

Will the cellular operator bypass the Telecommunication Interconnect Regulation, 2001 and the Telecommunication Tariff Order? Will BSNL incur huge losses because of new relationship between CMSPs and Bharti Telesonic? Will the new rate trigger a price war in STD in days to come?

Commenting on the development, industry insiders said Bharti Telesonic could implement the reduced tariff because of legal complications. Others felt that with Bharti’s IPO due in the last week of January, the December 18 announcement was a PR exercise to build up investor confidence for the IPO, especially as it gives an assured revenue stream to Bharti Telesonic.

Regional Classification
North South East West
Delhi Tamil Nadu Calcut Madhya Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh (West) Andhra Pradesh West Bengal Chhattisgarh (in MP)
Uttar Pradesh (East) Karnataka Orissa Gujarat
Uttaranchal (in UP West) Kerala Bihar Mumbai
Punjab Chennai Jharkhand (in Bihar) Maharashtra (incl. Goa)
Rajasthan Northeast Haryana Himachal Pradesh

First, subscribers should have the freedom to choose the NLD operator, and not cellular operators forcing them to opt for a particular one. As of today, there are two NLD operators— BSNL, the incumbent, and Bharti Telesonic, the only private operator in the country. NLDO guidelines state that it will be "mandatory for fixed service providers, cellular mobile service providers and cable service providers to provide interconnection to NLD service providers, whereby the subscribers could have a free choice to make inter-circle/international long distance calls through NLD service providers."

In the present scenario, however, cellular service providers are not providing any options to the customer as they cannot dial the NLDO of their choice. Instead, cellular operators are forcing the customer to opt for Bharti Telesonic. So, Bharti Telesonic cannot start services without carrier access codes being (CAC) in place, as one cannot force the customer to go by a particular route. And it seems it would be difficult for them to implement the new rates on January 26.

Asked to comment on CAC, TV Ramachandran, director-general of the Cellular Operators’ Association of India, said: "Because there’s a delay in grant of the carrier access code, which is not an aspect controlled by us, why should I force subscribers to go to BSNL?"

STD Tariff for Cellular-to-Cellular Call*
Time Band National (Rs. Per minute) Regional (Rs. Per minute) Home (Rs. Per minute)
9 am–9 pm (peak) 12 6 2.40
9 pm–9 am 6 3 2.40
*Customer has to also pay prevalent airtime while making a STD call
According to the announcement, there will be a cut in cellular to cellular STD rates by 50 %. So for a peak time rate of Rs 24 per minute presently, the cellular to cellular STD rate will be Rs 12 per minute (excluding the average airtime cellular tariff of Rs 2 per minute). But if one includes the cellular airtime tariff, the total cut in cellular to cellular STD tariff comes down to 42 % and not 50 % as promised by the cellular operators. As per the announcement there will be two time bands of peak (9 AM to 9 PM, Sundays, and three national holidays) and off peak (9 PM to 9 AM except Sundays, and three national holidays), and the country will divided in three distance zones— home (50-200 Km); regional (north, south, west, east), and national (inter region).

For simplicity, the country has been divided into four regions where telecom circles are clubbed together. The northern region comprises of Delhi, UP (W), UP (E), Uttaranchal, Punjab, Rajasthan, Haryana, and Himachal Pradesh. South comprises of telecom circles of Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala, and Chennai. East will have circles like Calcutta, West Bengal, Orissa, Bihar, Jharkhand, and NorthEast. West will have circles like Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Mumbai, and Maharashtra (including Goa).

Speaking about simplified structure, N Arjun, chief executive officer, Bharti Telesonic said, "The logic behind two time bands and three distance zone was to make it simple as the present structure was very confusing with five time bands and five distance bands."

According to Manoj Kohli, CEO, Escotel Mobile Communications Limited "The reduced prices will be applicable in three phases. In the first phase to be effective from 26th January 2002, telecom circles of Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai, Calcutta, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, UP (W), Haryana, Gujarat, Punjab, and Maharashtra will have this facility. Ist phase contributes around 70 % of the traffic. The second phase will be implemented in circles of UP (E), Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, and Kerala which will be effective from April 2002 which contributes around 20 % of the traffic. And the third phase in West Bengal, North East, Assam, Bihar, and Orissa which will be effective from 26th January 2003 and which contributes 10 % of the traffic." Even, cellular operators have plans to extend this 50 % cut in STD rates for calls made from cellular to PSTN in the third phase added Manoj Kohli.

According to the TRAI’s recommendation on carrier selection code, if any subscriber plans to make an STD call in a multiple regime NLDO, he or she has to dial the STD prefix, i.e. 0, followed by an NLD service code (NLDSC), a carrier access code (CAC), and thereafter the national significant number (NSN) of the dialed subscriber. So, for making a call from Delhi to Mumbai one has to dial 0 + 10 (NLDSC) + 55 (CAC) + 22 (Area Code) + 3451234 (Local Number).

The authority recommends adoption of 10 as the NLDSC. This code will have to be dialed for all NLD calls involving carriage over NLD network facilities. In regard to the CAC, which will identify the NLD operator chosen by the subscriber, the authority recommends a two-digit code beginning at 40 and ending at 59, thus giving 20 codes to be allotted to all NLD carriers, including BSNL. Recently, DoT allotted the CAC of 20 to BSNL and 50 to Bharti Telesonic. Though cellular service providers have assured TRAI in writing that they can implement CAC immediately, experts say even in the worst case scenario, it will take two to three months time for cellular service providers to upgrade their software so as to accept CAC and define call routing patterns. Even BSNL exchanges are not CAC-ready and cellular customers cannot exercise this option through BSNL exchanges. According to industry insiders, only 142 LDCAs out of 322 are CAC-ready. So, in the case of BSNL, it might take longer before a customer is given the option to choose the NLDO.

Once the CAC is in place, the cellular service provider has to inform customers about the dialing procedure and other details before implementing it. The customer has to be informed about the different tariff regime. Second, it seems cellular operators have pre-empted the tariff rebalancing exercise which is not expected before April 1, 2002, as the billing system of service providers has to be upgraded. Analysts feel that one might see the same tariff due to cost-based tariffs. TRAI is planning to come with cost-based tariffs even for basic services, as is the case with cellular. Presently, the monthly rental of a PSTN phone is subsidized at the cost of a STD call. Due to social obligations, the monthly rental for basic services is around Rs 250 per month, whereas it actually costs around Rs 500-650. According to industry analysts, STD calls are at a premium of 250% at present. If STD calls are made cost-based, the average cost for an STD call would be around Rs 4 per minute at peak time, in comparison to the existing average cost of Rs 10 per minute. Even cellular tariffs announced recently are on the higher side.

The industry has been talking about a level playing field, but in this case, there doesn’t seem to be one by any measure. Being a new entrant in the NLD segment, Bharti Telesonic has the advantage of not fulfilling any social obligation, but BSNL has to fulfill them being an incumbent and due to its vast reach—it controls 99% of the basic market. Sources in BSNL have gone on record as having said that "if BSNL is removed of its social obligations and basic services tariffs are cost-based, even BSNL can think of providing STD calls at almost the same price or even at lower prices".

But then, who is going to fulfil the social obligation and meet the objectives of NTP ’99, which promises the availability of "affordable and effective communications for all citizens"? Third, the reduction in cellular-to-cellular STD tariff is violating the revenue-sharing agreement between cellular service providers and NLD operators. Due to the agreement between Bharti Telesonic and cellular operators, the revenue-sharing arrangement shifts from 95:5 to 40:40:20.

Elaborating on revenue sharing, N Arjun, chief executive officer of Bharti Telesonic, said, "The revenue-sharing agreement will work out between three players—originator, NLDO carrier and terminator—in the ratio of 40:40:20. This is possible because of cost-based non-discriminatory interconnect regime and technological advances which have helped in lowering costs." As per an MoU, however, the revenue-sharing arrangement is bipartite and not tripartite, and it works to be 33.33% for the originator, 66.66% for the carrier (Bharti Telesonic) and 0% for the terminator.

A TRAI notification on interconnect called the "Telecommunication Interconnection (Charges and Revenue Sharing) Regulation, 2001" states in Schedule II, Item 6: "For local/domestic long-distance calls carried (partly) by basic service providers, an amount is to be paid to the basic service provider at a rate applicable to local/domestic long-distance call. The amount is to be calculated on the basis of the corresponding conditions specified in Item 3/Item 4."

The cellular service provider, therefore, will get only 5% of the total long-distance revenue, with the remaining 95% going to the NLD service provider. According to industry analysts, cellular operators are charging cost-plus tariff from the subscriber and therefore, they are not allowed to retain a portion of the STD charges. Whatever other benefits they get from the interconnect agreement have to be passed on to the consumer and not the cellular service provider.

On the interconnect agreement, TV Ramachandran said, "A figure of 5% is the minimum allowed and it says interconnect is mutually agreed upon and cannot be unilaterally thrust on me. So far, the agreement has been thrust on me. And since I had no bargaining power as even when I was entitled to a share of the long distance, I was not getting anything. By regulation, we are getting 5%. But I am entitled to a fair share of the interconnect. So nobody can stop us because there’s nothing wrong in this."

Fourth, the Telecommunication Interconnection Regulation 2001 is applicable from January 31 and not January 26. So, there’s a possibility that cellular service providers would like to avail of cuts in cellular-to-cellular STD calls by 50% for five days, as they are not covered by any regulation before January 31, 2002. But industry insiders say tat despite the interconnect agreement valid from January 31, they are still bound by the same interconnect agreement.

Fifth, the TRAI’s Telecommunication Interconnection (Charges and Revenue Sharing) Regulation, 2001 says: "The service provider may implement the proposed interconnection charges and revenue-sharing arrangements after the mandatory notice period of 45 working days." In the case of Bharti Telesonic, the interconnect agreement has not been signed till date and only one month is left. Therefore, it would be difficult for them to implement the STD cuts in cellular-to-cellular calls by January 26. But Arjun says, "If TRAI gives me a go-ahead, we will implement it. Otherwise we will not do it." As the interconnect agreement and tariff plan have not been finalized and submitted to TRAI by Bharti Telesonic, TRAI is not willing to comment.

If the TRAI still gives a go-ahead, despite these points, there is every possibility that BSNL will match or better Bharti Telesonic’s price and would like to consolidate on its customer base. What we are heading for then, is a price war in the days to come, with TRAI playing a crucial role and the drop in tariff a win-win situation for BSNL, Bharti Telesonic and consumers. Happy days, eh?!

Pravin Prashant/Voice&Data

Page(s)   1  

Print Comment Email DiggDigg DeliciousDel.icio.us RedittReddit TwitterTwitter



ZTE:Leading CDMA Technology


Extraordinary Networks:Freedom of Choice






Collective Intelligence @ Work

Analysts: Guiding Stars or Shepherds?

How's the 'pitch' looking?

What's your Everest?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Magazine Subscription | Sitemap | Contact Us | About Us | Advertising Print | Mediakit Print | jobs@cybermedia

Other CyberMedia web sites
  [Voice&Data]  [CIOL]  [PCQuest]  [Living Digital]  [IDC India]
  [CIOL Shop]  [DQ Channels]  [DQweek]  [CyberMedia Events]
  [Cybermedia Digital]  [CyberMedia India]   [Cyber Astro
  [Global Services Media ]  [BioSpectrum]  [BioSpectrum Asia]