|
Last month I wrote about the Governments email coverthe anonymous
designation email addresses bureaucrats hide behind, instead of the
name-linked addresses the world uses. Few bureaucrats read their mail.
I got some quick response to this from bureaucrats. Youve
over-simplifiedmy colleagues wont touch their email, whatever the email
address. Some get their PAs to print out emails, give it to them in a file, and
once in a while scribble responses to be typed in by the PA next week most
ignore their email altogether.
Another said: It would be nice to have personal addresses. But how will you
get us to use email? Why would I increase my work? Whats the incentive for me
to take initiative or perform?
Well. After many pay commissions and hikes, there is still no performance
based appraisal system for the bureaucracy, recommended for several decades, and
a standard part of the corporate world. There is not much incentive to perform.
Heres a long and passionate response from a senior bureacrat:
With our economy growing at 9%, we face many related issues. When I joined
the IAS over three decades ago, our finance secretary would tell me that it is
easy to manage deficit, but very difficult to manage growth. That hasnt
changed.
zI believe that infrastructure and bureaucracy will be the biggest
roadblocks to our growth story. Its possible to tackle infrastructure with
todays tools, including the PPP model. But it is very, very difficult to handle
the bureaucracy. Post 1991, major changes were expected, but we do not see much
effect on the ground. This is an area of serious concern. First, there is the
mindset. And then, no one wants to part with power.
With power comes the lack of transparency. After 60 years of independence,
we now needed a Right to Information Act! This is ironical. Democracy is
supposed to be a government of, for, and by the people. We are far from it. The
RTI is testimony to how bureaucrats enjoy power and its benefits, by not letting
the people know what is their legitimate right.
The gap is not technology. We have the tools. But e-governance first needs
good governance, and that must be preceded by governance. We are not governing
the way we should. Unless something drastic happens, our growth story will fall
by the wayside. It will be a very sad day indeed, for after so many decades, I
do feel proud when people look at our country with envy and wonder. The first
three letters of eGovernance spell ego. Let us see how fast we shed these three
letters!
I have little to add to that.
Page(s) 1
|