|
Moving ahead from Dataquest's first Summit, the 2006
Regional Summit across the four metros-Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai and Kolkata-aimed
at addressing these issues by developing through a consultative process, a
10-point action agenda for e-Governance in India.
What have emerged from the process and deliberations, are
the 10 practical and achievable steps aimed at making India a truly e-Governed
Nation. The agenda also clearly defines the driver for each charter, including
the role that responsible media such as the Cyber Media India and Dataquest can
play in this space. While some of these action points can be implemented in
2006, others can be initiated and completed in mid and long term.
The DIT and Government of India are already considering
some of the steps recommended by Dataquest. They have been included in the
agenda to make sure that the implementing agencies monitor and measure its
progress at each step. Dataquest would certainly follow it up by appraising the
overall implementation during its third Regional e-Gov Summit in 2007. Apart
from this, the magazine would also be constantly reviewing the agenda and
updating it based on interaction with all stakeholders, the citizen forums,
civil society bodies, various state and central government departments, vendors
and the DIT.
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
| GD Gautama,
principal secretary-IT, West Bengal |
|
Dr Neeta Shah, director,
e-Gov, Gujrat Informatics Ltd |
|
PV Unnikrishnan, executive
mission director, Information Kerala Mission |
|
Prakash Kumar, joint
secretary, Ministry of Ocean Development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
MR Rajagopalan, director,
CDAC-Chennai |
|
Dr M.Ariz Ahammed, CEO,
Assam SFAC |
|
SR Das, senior
director, DIT |
|
Satish Kaushal, country
manager, e-Gov (SWG), IBM India |
The Agenda
1 Consolidate
Applications
Primary Driver: DIT
Support: Media such as Dataquest
Identify 5-10 applications that can be delivered centrally-public grievance
system, issuance of certificates, FIR registration and criminal record,
education record, health records-while allowing for some interface
customization, if required. This may involve some GPR in the states, to adapt
local processes and formats to a common best practice model. Adoption will be
optional but DIT could focus on building application, ensuring implementation in
2-3 states; Dataquest and other media would help showcase the successes, and
both would urge adoption by other states.
It is also suggested that state could plan a separate data center for hosting
state-specific applications and loosely integrate inter-state applications by
using messaging systems. If states
were to accept such an IT design, DIT could sponsor implementation of IT
infrastructure for integrating all states, thereby creating India wide
e-Governance framework.
2 Create
Central Repository of e-Gov Resources
Primary Driver: DIT
Do a summary assessment of e-Gov projects in India and put them in a repository
at the national level for reference and adoption by various states and
government departments. Besides the project details, the repository would also
capture and display information on applications used in the project,
specifications, guidelines, source code, and vendor details.
| Beyond
the 10... |
|
The Dataquest e-Gov
Summit has added a new dimension to seminars, moving from a
speaker-delegate model to a consultative model with participants
contributing towards the common goal with their suggestions and feedback.
Besides the top 10 'things to do' as listed in DQ 10-Point e-Gov
Agenda 2006-07, there were several others as below.
-
Adopt IT in
education as a top most priority
-
Provide legal
sanction for all Government-to-Government, Government-to-Citizen and
Government-to-Corporate transactions either through adequate changes
in the IT Act 2000 or a new Act
-
Include e-Gov
initiatives as one of the parameters to decide allocation of funds for
the 11th Five Year Plan
-
Identify not so
sovereign government functions that can be outsourced.
-
Make IT component
mandatory in all Government of India funded projects.
-
Make e-security and
quality auditing mandatory for all e-Governance applications
-
Make it mandatory
for the governments or department to own the IP of the solution
/implementation to make replication possible
-
Make it mandatory
that all e-Gov projects should necessarily meet the basic requirements
of RTI Act (particularly Section 4,8 and 9)
-
Decide on a time
frame to move all manual transactions to the e-Gov way and work
step-by-step towards the goal
-
Push for Community
Radio policy pending with the Cabinet Council to further take e-Gov to
grassroots level. Accept TRAI's 2004 recommendation on CR.
|
It would also include learning from projects about various
shortcomings, FAQs, dos and don'ts and channels used, information about
research and development funded by the government and related agencies in
e-governance.
All projects listed in the repository would be available
for optional adoption and replication and should be either Open Source (GPL) or
the terms of contract should allow reuse by other government departments.
However, it's also possible to follow the shareware model. What this means is
that the applications can be put in the repository and a trial version be kept
for other states and departments to use and test it. The actual use would,
however, require license fee payment.
The Summit suggested that governments and departments
should also look forward to adopting and encouraging the Pro-bono model as one
of the options for e-Gov projects.
3
Standardize Record Formats
Primary Driver: DIT
Support: Media such as Dataquest
Identify 5-10 key areas-rural and urban land record, birth/death/caste
records, contracts, FIR and crime records, health record, education record,
driving license record and municipal tax record-and set up a working group
with fixed tenure to create a uniform standard for capturing data and records
across India. The working group can look into the best practices across the
states and create a uniform format that may be adopted by the states.
While the adoption would be optional, the DIT and the
Planning Commission can link further funding for these areas directly to
adoption of the format.
The common format would ensure that databases across the
states could be linked to each other at the national level, enabling better
planning option by respective governments and departments.
4 Roadmap
for a Resident ID Card
Primary Driver: PMO/Ministry of Home
Secondary Driver: DIT
Create policy road map, tech specifications and funding plan for a National ID
or Resident ID card project. This would include one card system and common data
structure at every level by initiating multi-utility, integrated National ID or
Resident ID Card system that should be capable of accommodating new department
needs and additional functionalities, as an when the need arises.
It could be similar to the US social security card or
Singapore's resident card system. The data from Rural Household survey,
Election ID, PAN, PF account and Passport can be used as an initial reference
point to take this forward.
The project should be driven by DIT at the initial stages
for creation of unique national or resident number, consolidated database
format, uniform specification for data collection and card issuance as well as
security and privacy policy.
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
| Dr Santosh Babu, collector,
Krishnagiri District |
|
Santanu Sengupta, CEO,
Grasso |
|
D Rajendran, commissioner,
Disciplinary Proceedings, Salem |
|
Umashankar CMD, ELCOT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
| Rohit Kumar Singh, secretary
IT, Rajasthan |
|
Talwant Singh, additional
district and sessions judge, Delhi |
|
S Abbasi, director, DIT |
|
Rajan Varda, project
director, SSK, UNICEF |
Page(s) 1 2 3
|