About four years ago, while traveling in the forest ranges of
Jharkhand to engage with the tribal communities, on issues related to the
delivery of essential public services, I had a fascinating chat with a survey
enumerator from one of the country's leading market research agencies. He was
recollecting his experiences in carrying out a survey on public health
facilities in one of the poorest states in India, a few years back. He and his
team had gone to a remote district to carry out an institutional assessment of
the facilities that exist in government hospitals.
He was surprised to see a long line of patients (in various
stages of distress) waiting in front of a rectangular box wrapped in black
cloth. A hospital staff sitting near the box orders each patient to come closer
and take a deep breath. A door suddenly opens and a bright light shines for a
moment. The door closes in a jiffy. The patient moves on and the next one lines
up. Intrigued by this "machine" my friend politely enquired with a
patient waiting in the line as to what this apparatus was. Prompt came the reply-X-Ray
Saab! Now curiosity got the better of my friend and he inched closer to the
"X-ray machine". It was a plain refrigerator!
The anecdote is both tragic and comical at the same time. But it
brings to play an interesting plot of how technology can be misused in a context
of ignorance and vulnerability. In some sense, one can locate the current
discourses on the prospects of e-Gov as a panacea for all developmental ills
along the same lines. e-Gov and its more ubiquitous avatar-the Internet-are
today seen as the new Spartacus, all set to liberate the seemingly
insurmountable problems with a click of a mouse. The rapidly proliferating
evangelists of the new "electronic" faith preach the glory of this
messiah in terms of the absolute power ordinary people will have once they get
baptized.
I must hasten to add here that I am not one of those anti
technology Luddites. I understand and appreciate that technological
possibilities could effectively address most of the daunting social realities
that excite and dampen the collective spirit of a nation transfixed at the
crossroads between economic prosperity and widening inequity. While the
potential of ICTs to enhance governance outcomes is quite undisputed, it is this
observed infatuation with technology as the sole driver for good governance that
is under a critical scanner. So, what does the future hold for e-Gov in India? I
propose seven themes that are likely to shape and influence the outcomes and
impacts of the next generation e-Gov strategies:
A Tech Paradigm: Governance is, in its true sense, all about
the vibrancy and resilience of institutions-economic, social and political.
Issues of accountability, transparency and responsiveness (often quoted as the
cornerstones of good governance) depend on the character and nature of
prevailing institutions. In socially fractured, economically skewed and
politically corrupted contexts, technology can easily be appropriated by the
powerful. It is naïve to assume that technology is a great leveler. Or, it is a
value neutral tool. It all depends on who owns and drives the tool. The right
strategy would be to create a level playing field through affirmative
institutional reforms and then unleash the potential of technology.
A Conscious Shift: The primary driver in most e-Gov
initiatives continues to be processes and techniques. Seldom are outcomes
measured and monitored. It is not uncommon to see many grand narratives on e-Gov
initiatives describe in detail issues of technology selection, re-engineering of
internal processes and organizational leadership qualities but remain
conspicuously silent on issues of inclusion, representation and other specific
governance outcomes.
Shifting Focus: A continuing weakness in many e-Gov
initiatives is the lack of clarity between e-administration and e-Gov. The
former is process driven and depends on internal changes, reforms, and
supply-side management. The latter, on the other hand, is outcome driven and
results in the real empowerment of the intended beneficiaries. Very often,
organizational imperatives override the larger social objectives. Using
technological possibilities to empower the marginalized and the vulnerable is
quite often sacrificed on the altar of efficiency and administrative controls.
Consumer Vs Citizen: One of the hotly contested themes in
public service delivery is the recasting of the citizen to that of a consumer or
user of services. From a strictly commercial sense this may make perfect sense.
However, given the welfare angle of most critical services, this recasting leads
to a danger of excluding those who don't fall under the category of a
"user". Further, the ambit of citizen rights is far wider than that of
a consumer. Also, in the case of critical services like health, security and
education any aberration or denial of services is a violation of a citizen's
fundamental right and not just a matter of consumer grievance.
| It
is naïve to assume that technology is a great leveler, a value neutral
tool. It all depends on who owns and drives the tool. The right strategy
would be to create a level playing field |
Revenue Models: A major strategy in the roll-out of next
generation e-Gov is the creation of 100,000 + Common Services Centers (CSCs) in
rural India. The National e-Gov Plan (NeGP) envisages that these front-end
platforms will enable government, private and social sector organizations to
integrate their commercial and social goals for the benefit of rural populations
in the remotest corners of the country through a combination of IT and non-IT
services. Though the rationale of facilitating a multi service point is well
appreciated (especially to incentivize potential rural entrepreneurs), the lack
of any clear thinking on the regulatory mechanisms is worrying. Emerging
evidences on public-private partnerships of similar nature show some disquieting
trends. An independent assessment carried out on the much celebrated
Computer-Aided Administration of the Registration Department (CARD) reforms in
Andhra Pradesh found no significant improvements on the service process–information
transparency, staff behavior, and the payment of bribes to secure registration–or,
on outcomes–perceived changes in service delivery ('Public Sector Reform and
Corruption: The CARD Façade in Andhra Pradesh', Jonathan Caseley, Economic
and Political Weekly. Yet another study on the Bhoomi project in Karnataka
(seen by many as the most successful e governance project in India) found
evidences of new rent-seeking and data compromising activities. The key USP of
the project–ease of access to land registration documents–is seen to come at
a price. A collusive nexus has emerged between the kiosk operator and the taluk
officials under the new digital system. Errors are deliberately introduced on
the pretext of typographical and then bribes are demanded to make corrections.
Ironically, this sort of manipulation was not possible in the old manual system
as the underlying text would show the original matter and the over-written
error. The same study also quotes that agents who facilitate buying and selling
of land in the Bangalore periphery region saying that the Bhoomi data was being
used by land sharks to identify properties that were vulnerable and buy them.
For instance, directed queries in the database were used to identify those
farmers in the taluk who had not paid land taxes and the landsharks would then
bribe taluk officials to grab control of the land. The point to note here is
that issues of transparency are not addressed automatically by just migrating to
a digital system. New forms of corruption and abuses are emerging. And with the
private partners now part of the service delivery process, the lines of
accountability are getting increasingly blurred. It should also be noted that a
key loser in this emergent scenario is the marginalized sections of society.
Adapting Technology
While on a visit to Kerala to study user feedback on an e-Gov project, a
poor farmer mentioned that interacting with a machine is quite intimidating. He
drew an interesting analogy: "it's like being put in a huge modern
supermarket just to get my daily quota of rice. I can't read or write and it's
impossible to figure out where provisions are kept. I would any day prefer my
neighborhood provision shop. I can talk to the shop keeper, argue, negotiate and
then buy". We are still in many senses a community moored in a strong
culture of orality. The challenge when looking for extending the contours of
e-Gov into the rural areas is to visualize beyond computers and explore other
media like television (especially, cable networks), radio and other interactive
media. The key here is to ensure that technology doesn't end up as an alien
and/or intimidating tool but blends and adapts itself to exiting social and
cultural ethos.
| The
key is to ensure that technology doesn't end up as an alien and
intimidating tool, but blends and adapts itself to existing social and
cultural ethos |
Political Incentives
For all those who sang praises on the wonders of what IT could do for the
country, the last Parliamentary election was a rude wake-up call. Champions of
the new IT faith like Chandrababu Naidu and SM Krishna lost out to a strong
negative vote from the rural constituencies. But the way the triumphant
incumbents responded to this message was more disastrous. Instead of applying
some of the effective urban centered e-Gov initiatives to the rural areas, the
instinct was to immediately disown most of the promising developments:
"Throw the baby with the bath water". There is a strong need to reach
out to the political levels and locate incentives for the politicians. The
prospects, promises and pitfalls of e-Gov should seep out of the current
technocratic frameworks to more political spaces. It is impossible to leapfrog
into a new technological future without the inconvenience of any political
discourse.
At the end of the day, it is the creation of strong institutions
and the empowerment of citizens through information and education that has the
potential to translate technological innovations to well meaning strategies to
counter some of the crippling economic and social maladies. All hyperbole on the
emanicipatory potential of technology will remain as a Pentium powered fantasy
which if played out, will only widen all existing chasms.
Gopakumar K Thampi
The author is the executive director of
Public Affairs Foundation, a non profit company, working on issues of good
governance
maildqindia@cybermedia.co.in