Home  |  Newsletter | Feedback | Advertise - Online  | Help

Google
Web dqindia.com
Search by issue  | Sitemap

• Visit pcquest.com to know all about the business benefits of IT infrastructure outsourcing • Ad : Visit the New Living Digital 2.0

 
Home > Enterprise > TECHNOLOGY

Techpoint : The Woman the World Forgot
Protests against mental and physical sexual harassment are getting louderbut is crediting another with a discovery because of gender any less alarming?
Deepa Kandaswamy
Monday, November 10, 2008
Print Comment Email DiggDigg DeliciousDel.icio.us RedittReddit TwitterTwitter

The world observes November 25 as the Day for Prevention of Violence against women. Sexual harassment can be either physical or mental. Crediting another with a discovery because of gender is also a form of sexual harassment. While the world is eagerly awaiting the Nobel awardees, it is time to remind the world of the real inventor.

Deoxyribonucleic Acid, more commonly known as DNA, is the foundation of life. It is the language in which the secret of life is written and the support in which it is preserved. The cell machinery, able to understand the Genetic Code, or language of life, can read this volume and then build the units that shape and make up a cell. The association of cells of the same or different kind makes up the organs of our bodies.

There is much more than a blueprint for the construction of a living organism in the DNA, but holding the master plan is one of its main characteristics. For more than five thousand years, life kept its secret and, until the 20th century, several unsuccessful hypotheses were made to explain how life originates from the union of man and woman. Some of them seem very incredible today, but in their time, they were as respectable as DNA is today.

This year we celebrate the 55th anniversary of the revelation by James Watson and Francis Crick of the double helical structure of the DNA molecule. Watson and Crick were awarded the Nobel Prize for physiology in 1962. Well, thats what most biology books teach. The real story is somewhat different.

In fact, three scientists were awarded the Nobel Prize: James Watson, Francis Crick and Maurice Wilkins. But one essential contributor to this discovery that would revolutionize biology as it is being understood now was forgotten, not only because of a premature death but because this contributor was a woman: Rosalind Elsie Franklin.

Rosalind Franklin was born in London in 1920. She was 15 when she decided to follow in the footsteps of Marie Curie, the first woman to win a Nobel Prize. The 100th anniversary of this event, of the Nobel Prize being awarded to a woman for the first time, is also being celebrated this year. Although she wanted to make a career in what was then essentially a mans field, this was not extraordinary; her family accounted for several powerful and influential women working with the scientific committee in the 1930s in central London.

In those days, female scientists were still a rarity, and she had to fight hard to get her position. She went to one of the few girls schools in London that taught physics and chemistry. Despite her relative failureshe didnt get a first when graduating in 1941she was offered a grant in Cambridge and presented her PhD in 1945.

Rosalind spent three years in Paris, where she learned the technique that would allow the elucidation of the DNA structure: X-ray diffraction. Back in England in 1951, she worked as a research associate in John Randalls laboratory at Kings College in Cambridge. It was Randall who gave the project to work on the structure of the DNA to Rosalind. At this time Maurice Wilkins, who was also working on DNA structure in Randalls lab but in a different research group, believed she was only a technical assistant, whilst Rosalind thought they were equals. This misunderstanding would damage their relationship for years.

It must be said that in those days, science was led by men. Even the college dining room was accessible only to men, as was the pub where scientists would meet after work. Rosalind was appalled by this institutionalized isolation of women scientists and rejected it strongly. She was not an easy woman, according to her male colleagues and scientific competitors, and had a reputation as the Iron Lady.

Early in 1953, James Watson and Francis Crick had been working for many years on the structure of the DNA molecules. They were near the solution, but still lacking the information that would solve the puzzle. At that time, many scientists were working on the same topic, and the competition was fierce. Linus Pauling, who would twice be awarded the Nobel Prize for Chemistry and Peace, was one of them. Alarmed by a paper presented by Linus Pauling on the structure of the DNA, Watson went to Kings College to meet with his collaborator Maurice Wilkins. In Randalls lab, Watson couldnt find Wilkins but bumped into Rosalind. It seems they too had an argument (according to Anna Piper, a friend and colleague of Rosalind). Wilkins finally arrived and took Watson aside in his office, where he showed him X-ray pictures taken by Rosalind and one of her X-ray photographs actually showed the double-helix shape. This gesture of good faith, done without Rosalinds knowledge, triggered Watsons immediate understanding of the secret of the structure of the DNA molecules and this allowed Watson and Crick to finally model DNA. On April 25, 1953, Watson JD and Crick FHC published the structure of the DNA in Nature 171:737-738. Rosalinds work was also published in the same issue, on page 740.

She kept working on the structure of DNA and on the Tobacco Mosaic Virus and published several articles and papers when working at Birkbeck College. She fell ill and died of ovarian cancer at age 37 in 1958, four years before the Nobel Prize was awarded to her competitors with whom she finally made peace. Doctors say she contracted cancer because of her work with X-rays with which she took pictures. The X-ray she used to discover the secret of life probably killed her, caused probably by the lack of adequate protection or shielding from the radiation in the lab.

Watson at last acknowledged her contribution in the last two paragraphs of the epilogue of his book: We both came to appreciate greatly her personal honesty and generosity, realizing years too late the struggles that the intelligent woman faces to be accepted by a scientific world which often regards women as mere diversion from serious thinking.

As the Nobel prizes are given this year, remember Rosalind Elsie Franklin and resolve to make sure this fate never befalls woman scientists and researchers of today.

Deepa Kandaswamy
The author is the founder-moderator of the IndianWISE e-group
maildqindia@cybermedia.co.in

The author is the founder-moderator of the IndianWISE e-group.
(c) Deepa Kandaswamy. First Indian serial rights, CyberMedia 2008.
Any quotes or reprints from this article must link to this article and credit author Deepa Kandaswamy and Dataquest.
This article may not be distributed or resold in any manner without written consent from the author.

Page(s)   1  

Print Comment Email DiggDigg DeliciousDel.icio.us RedittReddit TwitterTwitter









Collective Intelligence @ Work

Recession- Guest or Ghost?

'We are open' - Eyewash or Eye-catcher?

And your stocking says?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Magazine Subscription | Sitemap | Contact Us | About Us | Advertising Print | Mediakit Print | jobs@cybermedia

Other CyberMedia web sites
  [Voice&Data]  [CIOL]  [PCQuest]  [Living Digital]  [IDC India]
  [Global Services Media ]  [DQ Channels]  [DQweek]  [CyberMedia Events]
  [Cybermedia Digital]  [CyberMedia India]   [Cyber Astro
  [BioSpectrum]  [BioSpectrum Asia]  [DARE]  [Technology Review]