|
The anytime, anywhere banking concept has gained prominence in recent years
with Indian banks now offering customers the facility to transact from anywhere.
The earlier generation had to contend with banks functioning from 10 am to 5 pm
and no option for account operation from any other city, leave alone any other
branch except your own. All that is a thing of the past with most of us doing
banking transactions online, courtesy core banking solutions deployed in a
majority of Indian banks.
But considering that most Indian banks have multiple branches, the deployment
was not a cakewalk for the vendors. Most branches were operating in different
systems which meant that the branches were not centralized and each branch had
different servers. The difficult part was process standardization, ie, rolling
out common policies across branches, says Haragopal M, head, Finacle, Infosys.
Networking and connectivity were also crucial in deploying CBS as most
public sector banks have branches in far-flung locations and connecting them
with centralized network was difficult, says Abhay Sinha, senior vice president
and business head, BFSI, South Asia, 3i Infotech. Proper domain knowledge was
important as both vendors and banks had to speak in the same language, he adds.
Since core banking required business process re-engineering, most traditional
Indian banks were reluctant and expected manual processes to be customized in
core banking applications. They failed to see that the very reason of CBS
deployment was to improvise processes in order to make them more efficient. Data
migration too invariably had many gaps and integration to existing systems faced
roadblocks in terms of available documentation, says Hanumant Tripathi, CEO,
Infrasoft Technolgies.
V Senthil Kumar, VP, marketing, Oracle Financial Services Global Business
Unit adds that the initial days of automation were dogged by issues relating to
trade unions, and the challenges were around people being able to find new roles
with the implementation of CBS. The private banks were the first to take to CBS
followed by nationalized banks. Owing to enhanced experience of vendors and
bankers with many banks being in the third generation of IT investment with more
than 15-20 years in computerized mode, adoption of CBS has been on the upswing
in the last decade or so.
Cost Benefits
Unlike other solution deployments which see returns in some time, CBS
deployment enables banks to benefit right from day one. Most critical processes
can now be centrally handled, often with just one operator for maybe a bank of
500 branches.
A centrally located audit team is able to work at real time on the working
of the branches and add value at real time at great savings of cost and time,
says Tripathi. Banks can also now easily outsource many internal operations to
cost-effective locations. For instance a Nariman point branch will not have to
locate costly space to house a clerk to issue cheque books; this can now be
handled remotely, fast and accurate from a remote location like Dahisar.

Earlier it was common practice for the bank staff to work late completing
work like report generation and closing account books. Nowadays, the staff can
go home on time with all the work completed accurately through core banking. The
real beneficiaries are the customers and regulators. Customers can now avail
banking services 24x7 with geographies posing no barrier. Moreover Internet
banking, SMS banking and ATMs have made banking at convenience a reality.
Regulators too can get their reports more accurately and on time, and the bank
is able to deploy important regulatory applications like anti-money laundering.
 |
 |
|
Most branches
were not centralized and each branch had different servers. The difficult
part was process standardization
Haragopal M, Core
Banking, Infosys |
In India the
evaluation of any solution by the customer takes longer. People look at core
banking solution merely as a technology implementation not as a business
transformation program
N Ganapathy Subramaniam,
president, TCS Financial Solutions |
Incidentally Gartners Magic Quadrant Core Banking 2008 places three Indian
vendorsTCS, Infosys and Oracle Financial Services (earlier known as iFlex)as
the leaders in the category.
Modules Offered
While CBS includes the usual modules like retail asset and liabilities,
multi-currency, universal banking, private banking, investor servicing,
corporate banking, remittances, trade finance, Internet banking, loan
management, etc, the difference is the local flavor (read customization).
N Ganapathy Subramaniam, president, TCS Financial Solutions elaborates that
while the core system is standard across markets, country-specific customization
in terms of language (Chinese front end), regulation (Indian banks reporting to
RBI) is done. Even the RTGS connectivity is generic but the way it is installed
for Indian banks is different from what is done for the global players.
Indian Vs Global
The Indian market in the last 6-7 years has certainly evolved. The cost
advantage of Indian banks is unparalleled owing to their scale of operations.
For instance, Punjab National Bank has signed Finacle for installing Core
Banking in 1,300 rural branches, so obviously the cost of deployment comes down
automatically for the vendor. The Indian market has been fairly successful in
adaption. After lagging behind global players in technology adoption, it has
managed to pick up. Kumar says, The Indian market is the largest in terms of
banks investing in technology and these are fairly ahead and provide useful
insight.
Even as most vendors agree that Indian banks are fast catching up with their
global counterparts, most have issues with the Know Your Customer norms.
Subramaniam ends by adding, The Indian market differs from the global market
when it comes to solution selection process since the evaluation of any solution
by the customer takes longer. Also people look at core banking solution merely
as a technology implementation program not as a business transformation
program.
Stuti Das
stutid@cybermedia.co.in
Page(s) 1
|