Entrepreneur: Lord, I’m a struggling entrepreneur, and I’m feeling so frustrated. I have a great business plan for a great company, but I can’t raise the million dollars to launch this opportunity. I’ve talked to so many people, but they all say no. It seems like I’ve been trying to raise a million dollars for a million years!
Voice: Don’t despair.
Entrepreneur: Is that you, Lord?
Lord: Yes, it’s me, the Lord, and I want to tell you not to give up hope. Remember, a million years to you is like a second to me.
Entrepreneur: Really, Lord, a million years to me is like just a second to you?
Lord: That’s right, so keep trying.
Entrepreneur: Lord, if a million years to me is like a second to you, what’s a million dollars like to you?
Lord: A million dollars to you is like a penny to me.
Entrepreneur: Lord, can I have just one of your pennies?
Lord: Yes, in a second! |
That’s how the investment scenario also goes today dot-com entrepreneurs
versus venture capitalists—VCs aren’t funding those dot-coms.
There was a time when a well-presented e-business plan was a sure ticket to
becoming part of a VC’s portfolio. Now that looks like the story of a crazy
world that existed long, long ago. A world where the VCs were ready to dole out
money and investors’ appetite too for such stocks never seemed to be satiated.
The valuations kept on moving only in the upward direction). Of course, what was
missing was an element of sanity. Or how could a dot-com company like Indiaworld
with a revenue of Rs 1.5 crore be valued at a stupendous Rs 499 crore? And why
would loss-making dot-coms be valued at 100 times over their brick-and-mortar
brethren?
The reason was partly that VCs were flush with money, they still are, and
were too eager to invest. For them, the strategy seemed to revolve around the
law of averages. All they needed was a few multi-baggers among the numerous
companies in their portfolio and they would strike gold. Moreover, Nasdaq’s
tech stock seemed to be ever sky-rocketing and there was a never ending queue of
dot-com IPOs. Not only did this create ever-expanding VC funds but also made
Nasdaq the next stop for most dot-coms.
In India, we all know that barring Rediff, none of the other big dot-coms
have made it to any IPOs, leave alone the Nasdaq, even after spending several
crores on marketing and advertising.
Reality checks in
But all good things must come to an end. And so it happened with dot-coms. It
seems that one fine day investors woke up and started talking about profits and
long-term viability of the dot-coms. Earlier, entrepreneurs as well as VCs had
believed that setting up a Web site meant a better business model just because
they were selling online versus offline. Also, their value was really based on
high growth expectations, assuming flawless execution without any competition in
the next 4–5 years—a highly unrealistic scenario. And then it was like a
house of cards. Suddenly the whole dot-com business seemed fated to collapse.
Big, global names started to crumble as investors refused to part with more
money without proof of profits. The scenario seemed to have changed suddenly. In
order to stop bleeding, layoffs started becoming common among dot-coms.
Soon dot-coms were being shooed away from the investors’ portfolio. India’s
lone dot-com listing on the Nasdaq, Rediff, had been oversubscribed by over 18
times and had peaked to $26 around June 2000. But since the dot-com meltdown,
its scrip witnessed continuous new lows to reach its nadir of $2.5 by December
last year. The current price—$4.6. So, while current dot-coms are scampering
to find new revenue models and even newer VC partners, the VCs, after burning
their fingers are licking their wounds and moving to catch up with other trends.
India still a viable option
The short-term good news is that VCs are still flush with money and India
seems pretty high on their agenda. And the long-term good news is that they have
become a lot wiser, thanks to the dot-com experience.
India, sans dot-coms, remains a priority for most of the VCs as it has the
potential to give them the multi-baggers. Says Pravin Gandhi, director, Infinity
Technology Investments, "Yes, India remains a key market for investments
from venture capitalists and it is verified by the fact that a sizeable amount
of investment has flowed towards tech-driven startups over the last nine
months." India still has the basic components to bring in VCs in droves.
First, there is an abundance of talent available in the country. Though a bit
cliched now, the low-cost high-quality Indian workforce has brought in a comfort
factor for the clients in the developed countries. This was further strengthened
by the Y2K project work by Indian companies, which helped develop tremendous
branding for Indian SW professionals. So, VCs are also more comfortable dealing
with this brand. Second, there are a number of Indians in the Silicon Valley and
with many in the successful entrepreneurial mode, VC money is again more
comfortable in changing hands in India. Though the investments are still
insignificant as compared to global VC and angel investments, the trend is
rapidly picking up. According to Nasscom, the VC and angel investment in
high-tech firms in India is going to from $20 million in 1996 to an estimated
$1.2 billion by 2001 and could touch $10 billion by 2008.
VCs in India Next Page : Preference for tech firms Page(s) 1 2
|