Home  |  Newsletter | Feedback | Advertise - Online  | Help

Google
Web dqindia.com
Search by issue  | Sitemap

• Visit pcquest.com to know all about the business benefits of IT infrastructure outsourcing • Ad : Play and Plug ERP by IBM

 
Home > Top Stories

CSA: Customer Satisfaction Audit 2006
Continued from page: 2

Bhaswati Chakravorty
Saturday, February 04, 2006
Print Comment Email DiggDigg DeliciousDel.icio.us RedittReddit TwitterTwitter

CSA 2006: Servers


HP's  done it again. It has not only topped the satisfaction charts in the server category but also left its biggest competitor, IBM, behind by a healthy margin. HP stays unshaken at the top of the satisfaction chart. Overall satisfaction levels are up which seems to be a trend this year. Vendors are obviously leaving no stones unturned to ensure that they are able to offer the best deals to the CIO. This is also indicative of the stiff competition across product categories today.

Product dominates as the most critical derivative of satisfaction, while post sales service emerges as the second-most critical parameter in CSA 2006. In fact, CIO preferences remain completely unaltered when it comes to servers. Interestingly, price continues to remain least important in the server category. With servers being usually associated with mission-critical applications, several other factors play a critical role in the satisfaction quotient. However, as competition in the space heats up, it is the turn of CIOs to smile as vendors go overboard trying to woo them on all counts, including price.

Servers Satisfaction Scores
Industry HCL HP IBM Sun Wipro
Product (100)  87.7 83.6 89.3 87.7 89.8 84.5
Pre-sales & Marketing (70) 84.6 83.8 85.0 85.1 84.1 84.2
Price & Commercial (49) 84.6 84.5 86.2 83.7 83.2 83.6
Delivery &Installation (67) 83.8 82.1 84.4 81.6 84.8 86.4
Post sales service (71) 83.9 83.0 84.6 83.0 84.4 84.5

Base: 301 CIOs

How satisfied are CIOs with their notebook vendors,on five key parameters? This table lists scores derived from CIO responses to a range of questions. Figures (in red) indicate relative importance of the parameters as stated by respondents. Figures (in blue) show the maximum score in that category.

Dataquest-IDC India: Customer Satisfaction Audit 2006

 

Servers: The Top Two Parameters 
Industry HCL HP IBM Sun Wipro
Product  
Product reliability 88.0 84.3 89.9 87.8 89.0 85.8
Product functionality 87.4 82.9 88.4 88.1 89.5 83.3
Convenience in operation and
adoption of the product
87.8 83.6 89.5 87.3 91.0 84.2
           
Post-sales & marketing            
Always available for technical queries 84.1 82.8 85.0 83.4 84.0 84.2
Expertise of the vendor to resolve problems 83.9 82.1 84.5 82.9 84.6 85.8
Availability of spare parts 83.2 85.7 83.9 82.4 84.6 87.0
Interaction with service team  83.9 81.4 85.0 83.2 84.3 81.0
Note: The satisfaction scores are on a 100-point scale with 100 indicating the highest degree of satisfaction-very satisfied                Base: 301 CIOs
HP and Sun, the top two server companies in CSA 2006 has beefed up its post-sales service offerings with both delivering above the industry average on all counts

While HP may not have topped on all counts, it is again the company's consistent performance that sees it through to the top. Put simply, HP has only done better what it was already doing well in the past.

While HP did not top all parameters, it was its consistent performance on every one of them that saw it through to the top of the chart
Server Vendor Ranks
Brand  Rank-06 Rank-05
HP 1 1

SUN 2 4
Wipro 3 5
IBM 4 2
HCL 5 6
Note: Acer was not included in the server category this year
Up  Down   Unchanged

HCL Infosystems stays at the bottom of the charts on most satisfaction derivatives. Sun has beefed up on all parameters offering much more attractive portfolio of products and deals to the customers. This is reflected in the high satisfaction ratings the vendors received this year. Sun's and Wipro's gain is IBM's loss, which has to stay content at the number four position. However, the statistical significance of the difference in satisfaction scores between Wipro and IBM is very low which indicates, one, the intensity of competition, and two, the complexity of dealing with a larger installation base-as in the case of IBM.

Page(s)   1  2  3  4  5  

Print Comment Email DiggDigg DeliciousDel.icio.us RedittReddit TwitterTwitter



ZTE:Leading CDMA Technology


Extraordinary Networks:Freedom of Choice






Collective Intelligence @ Work

Analysts: Guiding Stars or Shepherds?

How's the 'pitch' looking?

What's your Everest?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Magazine Subscription | Sitemap | Contact Us | About Us | Advertising Print | Mediakit Print | jobs@cybermedia

Other CyberMedia web sites
  [Voice&Data]  [CIOL]  [PCQuest]  [Living Digital]  [IDC India]
  [CIOL Shop]  [DQ Channels]  [DQweek]  [CyberMedia Events]
  [Cybermedia Digital]  [CyberMedia India]   [Cyber Astro
  [Global Services Media ]  [BioSpectrum]  [BioSpectrum Asia]