|
Powering Businesses
Clients are increasingly demanding a partner who can offer end-to-end
services-from consulting, project management, and integration to offering
managed services. Therefore, it is not simply the case of uptime SLAs anymore.
The clients now want the managed service provider to do disaster management,
bandwidth management, application response time management and coordination with
telcos for availability of lines and security implementation as well. The entire
accountability lies with the managed services provider and, therefore, unified
SLAs have become more popular in the recent past.
The most widely offered services from quite a few players are
onsite infrastructure managed services (also referred to as Facility Management
by some) wherein the customer outsources its IT management to third party
vendors with multi party skill-sets, says Bimal Raj of Allied Digital. The
remote infrastructure management model is one in which remote network
application management and server management is done by the vendor, albeit
remotely from a centralized location, adds he. Although the latter is being
offered by some, it's still not widely adopted in India as compared to onsite
services.
|

|
|
"A managed services
provider is a more evolved form that a traditional network integrator has
been assigned, or has taken upon himself. Logically, it is the next step
in his learning, business ability and evolution process" |
|
-Balwinder Singh, director,
Targus Technologies |
Generically, the offering looks the same from every vendor, but
the actual delivery, and quality processes to back the delivery vary widely
between service providers. Frontier Business Systems, for example, has a
structured delivery process and follows ITIL-based practices in its IMS service
delivery to customers. It has a robust process-based back office with a wide set
of skill-sets to monitor and manage service delivery, handle escalations and
minimize infrastructure downtime.
And like all new market places, the space today has mostly MSPs
who offer varied flavors of the generic network and server monitoring services.
"As technology infrastructure becomes more and more critical to business,
the space will witness a shift to a more value-based and domain centric offering
which encompasses the entire IT stack-servers, networks storage, applications
and desktops," Rangarajan believes. Vitage is keen to pioneer this shift
and as a step in this direction is marketing itself as a provider of Business
Service Management which bridges the gap between business processes and
technology by using technology based on business process demands.
Closer Look
The trend is towards more and more organizations looking at outsourcing IT
to managed service providers. The extent of outsourcing varies between
organizations but the market players predict a large scale outsourcing happening
over the next five years. Raj of Allied Digital believes that there is huge
amount of growth in the large customers consolidating their network space.
"The big outsourcing deals that have hitherto been limited
to the big players will now spread to medium sized players as well with the size
of deals continuing to be significant," forecasts Rangarajan. There will
also be some movement towards open source based tools, adds he.
Chopra of Team Computers predicts that Remote Infrastructure
Management is one of the key offerings that is quite new. While most large
companies use very expensive software, Team, on the other hand, has invested in
building its own platform over a period of two years for ensuring flexibility,
cost effectiveness and value to the end customer.
|

|
|

|
|
"While most large
companies use very expensive software, we have invested in building our
own platform over a period of two years for ensuring flexibility, cost
effectiveness and value to the end customer" |
|
"Owing to our
positioning in the market, it has been but obvious to offer a single
window to the complete set of IT infrastructure solutions and services
needed by enterprise customers" |
|
-Ranjan Chopra, chairman
and managing director, Team Computers |
|
-AS Prasad, business
head, Information Security Consulting, Frontier Business Systems |
Most players agree that any segment that is totally commoditized
will become a volume game or a size driven market-the MSP business is still
not there. Service deliverables and responsiveness backed by a decent ability to
react and handle problems for customers will be the prime reason behind the
relatively smaller players beating the larger ones.
However, organizations now have more stringent quality
parameters and are looking at SLA-based contracts and compensation. Customers
are also more discerning about quality and do differentiate between service
providers based on multiple performance parameters.
While the business is expanding, existing players are improving
their efficiencies and the market is quite competitive and margins can get
squeezed. "On the flip side is the fact that selling and marketing costs of
business acquisition or customer retention are lower, especially when one is
dealing with the same customer for several other IT requirements," says
Prasad. Bimal Raj, however, feels that the tier-II portfolio includes plain
vanilla services like facility management and AMC, which some players are trying
to include in managed services.
Most of the existing players do not host applications since most
customers are reluctant and have issues in hosting their applications on MSP
servers. But a small number of players have started hosting simple applications
that help do their jobs better. For instance, while Vitage has started messaging
applications and plans to add other business application in due course, Targus
uses PatchEasy which helps in patch management and mass deployment of patches
across an enterprise, and a Service desk which manages service calls (request
for service from end users) and helps them manage the SLAs signed. Allied
Digital too does not host applications and instead provides consultancy services
to clients. Team Computers, on the other hand, apart from ofering the usual IT
services that range from desktop support, network support, data centre support,
application support, etc, also offers a web-based service monitoring dashboard
which allows key personnel of the customer to slice and dice service delivery
information on a real time basis.
| Service
deliverables and responsiveness backed by an ability to react and handle
problems for customers are the prime reason behind the relatively smaller
players beating the larger ones |
 |
On the margins front, Chopra says that these are decided
depending upon the deal size, duration of the contract and deliverables.
However, it is safe to say that margins are between 20-25%, he adds.
Is the Market Big Enough?
One of the key developments has been the realization that larger brands may
not always be the best bet for managed services. This is because the flexibility
that businesses expect IT to have is not easily deliverable when larger players
are involved. So CIOs have started looking at companies that follow processes as
the enabler and not as a limiter.
With the market itself growing and no single player poised to
address, individually or together, the entire market segment, there is a fairly
large market segment open to these tier-II MSPs to tap into.
While the big players have the advantage of several years of
market presence in the services segment, the tier-II players have a single point
of management and accountability. They also have good technical and management
skills and service delivery capabilities are at par. The in-depth information
about local requirements is another advantage that these smaller players have.
"The tier-II MSPs have knowledge of the local requirement in terms of local
language, each vertical having its own share of problems and cost
advantage," says Raj.
| Top
Targus Targets |
-
Nokia
-
Bharti Airtel Limited
-
EXL Service
-
CDOT
-
Dabur
-
HFCL
-
Genpact
-
Directorate of Education
-
Mapinfo
-
Whirlpool
-
Hutch
|
Singh of Targus Technologies says that one of the sure shot ways
of competing with the bigger players is to offer value additions, keeping the
customers satisfied by not just honoring the SLAs but also exceeding them and
being more flexible. This is an industry where referral checks work and the MSP
has to build its reputation over the years.
Another way of growing in the cut-throat market is by focussing
on specific vertical domain segments where these small players can deliver
significant value through their technology and domain competency. "We can
also register growth by focusing and building on the BSM methodology and
application management," says Rangarajan.
As the needs of the organizations continously change, it is
always a challenge for the MSPs to ensure that their offerings are in tune with
the consistently fluid technology space. This segment too has not been spared
and has its own unique set of problems. One of the major being availability of
skilled and trained manpower although most players are trying to mitigate the
problem by introducing trainee programs, proactive recruitment and deployment of
bench strength into the system integration support process.
These problems, however, pale when one considers the quantum of
growth this market is seeing. The players agree that the tier-II MSP market
offers tremendous opportunity. And, most importantly, with no single big player
poised to address, individually or together, the entire market segment there is
room for everyone.
Stuti Das
stutid@cybermedia.co.in Page(s) 1 2
|