Home  |  Newsletter | Feedback | Advertise - Online  | Help

Google
Web dqindia.com
Search by issue  | Sitemap

• Visit pcquest.com to know all about the business benefits of IT infrastructure outsourcing • Ad : Play and Plug ERP by IBM

 
Home > Mobility

RFID: Planned Success
A sound planning process and looking beyond technology eases the pain points of implementation and helps create a successful long term RFID strategy
Thursday, September 21, 2006
Print Comment Email DiggDigg DeliciousDel.icio.us RedittReddit TwitterTwitter

RFID has been a mainstay in popular imagination for some time now. With the Department of Defense rolling out a very successful and large implementation followed by Wal–Mart's expression of faith in the same, RFID got all the press and CIO attention that it needed. But when it comes to on the ground RFID implementation, a large number of organizations are still grappling with issues and are hoping that some day they will bump into the wise caterpillar smoking his hookah just like Alice did in the rabbit hole.

All the trends emerging out of the RFID triumphs and tribulations have a common thread. And that is that technology is not very far from being mainstream. And it's not long before Kevin Kelly's prophecy of 1997 that every manufactured item will have a flake of silicon in it, comes true. Meta Group/Gartner estimates that by 2008, 30% of all manufactured goods will have RFID tags attached to them, and with a growing trend, to over 80% by the end of 2013. Its common knowledge now that the benefits are multi dimensional and sum of all these advantages far outweighs the seemingly large initial investment. But the real world challenges are far from tackled. And, therefore, the technology is far from being mainstream. In a recent interview to a global business magazine, Rob Carter, CIO, FedEx, said, “RFID might be a three-fifteen technology.” This was a take on Bill Gates' definition of a “two-ten technology.” That is, for the first two years, hype reigns, followed by disappointment, until the day ten years later when people realize the technology has become embedded in daily life.

There are many a slip between the cup and the lip and looking at them through the eyes of a large apparel manufacturer makes it easy to understand that the old principles still apply.

The Challenge
Let's call this apparel company AppCo, which is a large apparel manufacturer and owner of several brands of clothing lines for men, women and children across the casual and formal wear segment. Apart from ownership of the brand and related marketing, the company also operates several distribution centers. These centers act as the hubs that feed the retail chains through their hub and spoke model.

AppCo did not want the RFID implementation to be just a one off roll out, but to bring into its supply chain the efficiencies that were theoretically thought to be possible, namely, efficient inventory management and control, lowered levels of stock and fewer stock out situations coupled with simplified warehousing processes.

The Solution
AppCo's vision of driving RFID implementation was long term, therefore, the company opted for the obvious long-term planning approach and ensured a provision of flexibility to deal with possible inorganic growth opportunities.

As the first step in the long journey, AppCo created an in-house cross-functional team of experts to study the alternative technology solutions and providers available in the market. This was undertaken through a mix of secondary information and calling for vendors to directly educate the team on their solutions. The team looked at a host of issues other than the technology and the solutions. These ranged from testing the preparedness of distribution centers for implementation, identifying the product line that would be among the first to be tagged and tested.

The next step that followed was by far the most extensive and tedious. It involved mapping the processes at all its distribution centers for all its brands across all clothing lines. This was done with a two-pronged objective. One was to ensure that the final solution roll out would be applicable for one and all and the second was to ensure that AppCo could retrofit the available tags, readers and the middleware to create a best in class solution.

The Learning
The situation in the AppCo case has been overly simplified to send home a few very critical points
1 | It is imperative for a company to discern the value of the technology with respect to the business challenges, and companies should be aware of both the advantages and the pitfalls associated with any technology. The hype associated with a technology often blinds decision makers to the pitfalls and only amplifies the associated benefits. And the only way to understand all of this is education. AppCo's cross-functional team was a step in this direction.

2 | Establish a proof of concept. Real on the ground roll out can be replicated only on the ground. The proof of concept not only builds organization wide confidence but also allows for future rollouts to continue through minimal changes to the existing system.

3 | Spend as much time and energy as possible to ensure that the RFID network is highly reliable. AppCo entered into an extensive process mapping exercise to ensure the best tags, the best readers and all the associated software and hardware were best in breed.

4 | Look beyond technology. AppCo looked at the preparedness of distribution centers for implementation. In translation it means consider the business processes and also the physical layout of the location. This will help address issues like selecting most appropriate place for the readers for ease of inventory movement.

It was at this juncture that AppCo also considered hiring an implementation consultant. The consultant suggested the roll out in phases. In the first phase two brands across one distribution center were RFIDed. Once AppCo smoothened the issues at its test distribution center, the entire center went the tag way. The success of the first distribution center was quickly replicated across all the others. By rolling out the implementation in a staggered manner over a pre-defined timeline, AppCo lowered the cost of implementation at the last center by as much as 20%. Added to this was the cost saving that accrued to AppCo through its ability to predict tag consumption over the long-term. Thus, by utilizing a volume contract on tags, AppCo was able to save significantly by simply purchasing tags at the time of consumption. In effect, AppCo created an optimal inventory level for tags as well.

Mohit Chhabra
maildqindia@cybermedia.co.in

Page(s)   1  

Print Comment Email DiggDigg DeliciousDel.icio.us RedittReddit TwitterTwitter



ZTE:Leading CDMA Technology


Extraordinary Networks:Freedom of Choice






Collective Intelligence @ Work

Analysts: Guiding Stars or Shepherds?

How's the 'pitch' looking?

What's your Everest?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Magazine Subscription | Sitemap | Contact Us | About Us | Advertising Print | Mediakit Print | jobs@cybermedia

Other CyberMedia web sites
  [Voice&Data]  [CIOL]  [PCQuest]  [Living Digital]  [IDC India]
  [CIOL Shop]  [DQ Channels]  [DQweek]  [CyberMedia Events]
  [Cybermedia Digital]  [CyberMedia India]   [Cyber Astro
  [Global Services Media ]  [BioSpectrum]  [BioSpectrum Asia]