|
If there has been the one big learning from the recent financial crisis
that hit the US economy, it would have to be regulations. It is no secret that
the lack of it fuelled the sub-prime debacle. RBIs guidelines for mobile
banking transactions released in October 2008 have come in at a time when the
financial sector can do with some caution and control.
Guidelines should now formally allow banks to offer secure mobile banking
services. Sanjay Swamy, CEO, mChek Payment Systems, expects the formalization of
the guidelines to drive more action and activity. The guidelines will help
instill greater confidence in the customers regarding mobile banking
transactions. Until recently, most banks focused on balance alerts and
transaction alerts in the name of mobile banking. Abhishek Sinha, CEO, Eko
points out that banks can now look at the mobile as a low-cost and an efficient
alternate channel to access your account for money transfer, utilities, bill
payments and premium payments.
TelcosLeft in the Lurch
According to Sinha, the guidelines allow only bank-led models and therefore,
telecoms will not be able to play a lead role as they wanted to, limiting
telecom operators as just a channel of communication.
Telecom operators rework models like M-Pesa, G-cash. "Guidelines insist on
interoperability, and the mobile payment companies can play a greater role in
managing relationships between the banks and various telecom operators to ensure
this," adds Sinha.
However, Probir Roy, CEO of PayMate holds the opinion that the guidelines are
a Win-Win for the various stakeholders in the value chain.
|
Checking the Guidelines |
Operative Guidelines
- Transaction limit as daily cap of Rs
5,000 per customer for funds transfer and Rs 10,000 per customer for
transactions involving purchase of goods/services
- Banks may put in place a monthly
transaction limit depending on banks risk perception of the customer
- Authentication Guidelines
- One time approval of the RBI; approval of
the banks Board of Directors
- Document-based registration with mandatory
physical presence of the customers
- Allowing only Indian Rupee based domestic
services with strict prohibition on cross-border inward and outward
transfers
- Only banks, that are licensed and
supervised in India, and have a physical presence in the country will be
permitted to offer mobile banking services
- Banks that have implemented core banking
solutions would be permitted to provide mobile banking services
- Services shall also be restricted only to
customers of banks and/or holders of debit/credit cards issued as per the
RBI guidelines
Interoperability Guidelines
- Banks must ensure services to customers
irrespective of the network operator they have subscribed to. The leeway
is limited to a maximum period of six months
- To enable real time fund transfer
guidelines stipulate that banks adopt message formats like ISO 8583, with
suitable modification to address specific needs
Security Guidelines
- All mobile banking shall be permitted only
by validation through a two factor authentication
- One of the factors of authentication shall
be mPIN or any higher standard
- End-to-end encryption of the mPIN is
desirablewhere mPIN is used,
- For mobile banking facilities that do not
contain the phone number as identity require a separate login ID and
password to ensure proper authentication
- It is necessary that the mobile banking
servers at the banks end or at the mobile banking service providers end
to be certified by an accredited external agency
- There must be appropriate level of
encryption and security at all stages of the transaction processing with
an endeavor to ensure end-to-end encryption of the mobile banking
transaction
- Banking regulations require implementation
of application level encryption over network and transport layer
encryption wherever possible
- Establish proper firewalls, IDS, data file
and system integrity checking, surveillance and incident response
procedures and containment procedures; implementing physical security
measures, conducting periodic risk management analysis, regular audits on
the mobile banking systems, etc.
|
Loopholes Glaring
While the guidelines issued by RBI are comprehensive and considered a
satisfactory beginning, experts have identified some loopholes that will require
plugging. For one, the approvals (RBI and Board) required for such projects may
slow down the process, even though these are just one-time approvals.
Physical Verification:
Secondly, mandatory physical presence of the customer for registration may
affect the uptake amongst not only the banked but also the unbanked segment. One
of the arguments against this is the fact that physical verification is done
separately for opening a bank account and getting a mobile phone connection,
both of which are part of the mobile banking system. Sinha opines that remote
registration for the service should be accepted. Banks and telecoms should be
allowed to share and use the KYC documents collected from the customer once.
However, both Swamy and Roy are in favor of physical verification
requirement. Roy agrees that while there are practicality and logistics issues,
but KYC is important. "While many believe that this could slow down the adoption
process, we believe that this will help build stronger customer confidence and
lower support costs as customers get trained on the start of this service. From
a long-term view this will be very beneficial to the industry as it grows," says
Swamy.
Transaction Limits:
The central bank has already upped the transaction limits from its earlier
draft guidelines, RBI increased the daily transaction limit for cash
transactions from Rs 2,500 to Rs 5,000, and the daily transaction limit for
goods and services from Rs 5,000 to Rs 10,000. The maximum cap has been an area
of contention with some insisting that the existing limits are too low.

One school of thought insists on why the rules should be any different from
those for internet based transactions? Intuitively it is a remote channel, no
different from the internet, rather significantly more secure than the internet,
as Swamy points out.
Over time, Swamy expects that the limits will stabilize around Rs
25,000closer to a daily withdrawal limit on your debit card. Roy feels that the
caps should be in line with cc/dc and/or ATM, preferably the former. Further,
the bank should be able to decide limits for its customers.
Interoperability:
Interoperability is critical for mass adoption and for scaling the market
exponentially. However, the time frame of six months can be a limiting factor.
Dynamics between the banks and telecoms will become clear with time. There are
certain apprehensions that banks may become dependent on telecom operators,
which may slow down the process. Also, if telecom operator sees a greater role
than just being the bearer of information, then it may be easier to provide
interoperability, adds Sinha.
Further, interoperability depends on the technology used. SMS-based services
are operator agnostic where as there is much more dependence on the operator in
SIM-based applications. Telecom regulations will also bear an impact.
End-to-end Encryption:
The draft for guidelines insisted on end-to-end encryption but this clause
has been relaxed in final guidelines. According to Roy, there is also lack of
clarity on what end-to-end encryption means whether it means device level to
device level across all layers of security, ie, data, network, transport,
device/end point. Then there has to be availability of such technology which
allows this to be done universally. "I dont think encryption is a mode of
security relevant to India at this stage of its growth with dependency on entry
level handsets and use of mobile for small value transactions," he adds.
Encryption as such has not eliminated security risk for the Internet or
e-commerce. Technically speaking the CDMA network is theoretically best
configured for authentication and encryption vide their E-CMEA sub system. This
allows from keypad level (device) to voice, data, messaging to be secure over
the signaling system.
All said and done end-to-end encryption is not the only way to secure the
mPIN and the transaction. Also, with the limits and other security processes in
place the risk of misuse or exploitation of the channel is considerably reduced.
Further, most banks will insist on end-to-end encryption to be mandatory and not
desirable.
The customer protection is the fundamental base of the guidelines And
confidence will come with use.
Shipra Malhotra
shipram@cybermedia.co.in
Page(s) 1
|