Telecom has been one of the major contributors to the domestic IT market for
the last few years, and FY 2003-04 was no exception. At Rs 4,339 crore, it was
the second largest vertical in this market. Its significant position can be
ascribed primarily to three factors-the fast pace at which the government
deregulated the telecom sector, the advent of the unification regime, and, most
importantly, the stupendous growth in subscriber base that every service
provider witnessed.
All these factors led to the rapid rollout of wireless networking across the
country, generating tremendous demand for telecom software across the physical
layer, from switches to the enterprise level. Even on the hardware front, the
growth was phenomenal, especially since every kind of telecom equipment requires
IT support at the backend for its smooth functioning.
With more and more service providers entering the market and rapidly
expanding their services, the demand for OSS/BSS and network management tools
has grown exponentially. To sustain themselves in this highly competitive
market, service providers had to invest in infrastructure, improve quality of
service, network efficiency and billing solutions. And these were precisely the
factors driving the adoption of IT in the domestic market.
The Rs 175 crore OSS/BSS market saw in play some interesting dynamics. While
Indian vendors like Wipro, Infosys, TCS or Subex were busy catering to foreign
service providers, the domestic market was dominated by players like CSG,
SchlumbergerSema, ADC, Convergys and Eftia. Mobile and private fixed-line
operators accounted for Rs 125 crore of the overall spend, with new service
providers like Reliance and Tata Indicom taking a large share of this pie.
Billing remained the single largest component, though revenue assurance also
gained in importance. Two new demand areas in the OSS space came into the
limelight, the first being fixed-line service providers offering broadband and
data services, as also GSM service providers who have started managing GPRS
networks in tandem. The second flavor of the year, with cases of unpaid dues
increasing, was fraud management.
|
|
|
With subscriber bases witnessing a multi-fold increase, CRM was an absolute necessity; while different BI tools were implemented to integrate with the CRM.
|
There are 7.6 crore subscribers in the country for the services offered by
fixed-line and cellular operators (both GSM + CDMA). In addition to managing a
growing customer base, the operators have to deal with issues of customer churn,
network optimization, and increasing cross-holdings amongst existing customers.
Regulatory changes too have added to the service providers' usage of IT. Most
telecom service providers recognized Business Intelligence tools as a strategic
IT investment and looked for enterprise BI suites that would serve the needs of
several different types of users, with the impetus to purchase BI solutions
coming from functionalities like churn management, marketing automation and
segmentation management. No wonder then that this entire enterprise software
portfolio, including BI, CRM and related applications, made up a market of the
size of Rs 1,583 crore.
Customer churn and network optimization are in some ways linked to each
other. As far as telecom service providers are concerned, it was imperative to
understand the reasons behind consumer churn and prevent it from happening, or
at least contain it. One key deterrent to churn is effective customer service,
for which it is necessary to have solutions in place for registering customer
data, studying and analyzing behavior and spending patterns to predict the
propensity to churn, which will enable the providers to effectively address
issues and increase customer loyalty and retention. Many service providers like
Orange, BPL Mobile and Bharti adopted BI suites from vendors like SAS and
Teradata and aligned them with CRM and churn management solutions.
Another catalyst driving IT usage in this sector was the growing realization
amongst service providers about the need to provide data services. Eventually
data ARPU (Average Realization per Unit) would leave behind a dwindling voice
ARPU, and for the development and maintenance of different data applications,
the increasing adoption of IT is inevitable. The best examples were Reliance
Infocomm and Bharti, both of whom unveiled a slew of enterprise and consumer
data applications. Many of these applications were closely integrated with IT
applications; besides, their entire development was done solely on IT platforms.
For example, the CIO of a carrier has to decide whether to continue to use J2ME
as a development platform or whether to go for BREW from Qualcomm.
Networked storage was one area where the telecom vertical witnessed massive
upheavals. Most of the bigger telcos implemented SAN solutions during 2003-04,
since increases in their subscriber base necessitated migration to a faster and
more reliable mode of storage. The entire storage market for telecom was pegged
at Rs 184 crore. VSNL went for a SAN solution from Hitachi, while Bharti and
Tatas went for EMC solutions. Storage adoption in telecom was not merely
restricted to SAN implementation but also involved storage virtualization. The
obvious advantage of storage virtualization for telecom service providers is
that it simplifies and makes storage administration less expensive.
Managed network services as part of overall network integration at Rs 721
crore was another growth area in telecom. With all service providers busy
expanding infrastructure and building capacity, the trend was to offer better
SLAs to customers with an eye towards customer retention. As a result, there was
increased utilization of fault and performance management tools by the telcos.
It was true not only of the voice-based service providers, but also of ISPs;
VSNL, Sify and Dishnet, for example, focused hard on the SLA front.
One interesting sidebar: the IT adoption rate in the Indian telecom sector
got increasingly skewed towards the service providers. No one, including fixed
line carriers and ISPs like Sify and Data Access, not to mention the large
cellular carriers, lagged behind in investing in IT. However, the OEMs were
increasingly sidelined in terms of their IT usage quota, for carriers were not
very excited by new technologies like 3G and GPRS as these are yet to mature to
the levels anticipated earlier, and have not at yet been widely deployed at the
mass level either. Further, funding for these new technologies was either
non-existent or much too small. All these factors contributed to the drying up
of cash inflow to OEM vendors and subsequently to IT spending.
Rajneesh De in Mumbai